But, honestly, would the release of images of Osama bin Laden with a bullet hole over his eye and caked in blood do anything besides satisfy some people's prurient curiousity? Is this enough to override the potential harm it could do by offending Muslims worldwide?
(And note, the question of giving offense obviously shouldn't be the driving determination of our behavior, i.e. defending Salman Rushdie's right to write The Satanic Verses or allowing newspapers to publish cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad without fear of mindless retaliatory violence).
But given that even al-Qa'ida concedes bin Laden was killed in the raid, I have a hard time seeing any strategic upside to the publication of these pictures as opposed to potential negative second/third-order effects.
Please feel free to comment if you have any thoughts on this.
Apparently, The Onion's photo from May wasn't genuine. |
No comments:
Post a Comment