Friday, March 9, 2012

Today in Manhunting History -- March 9, 1916: Villa Attacks the United States

In 1916, Columbus, New Mexico was little more than “a cluster of adobe houses, a hotel, a few stores and streets knee deep in sand” filled with cactus, mesquite and rattlesnakes. Only about 300 people lived in this desolate town three miles from the Mexican border, and if not for Camp Furlong, home to a 350-man detachment of the 13th U.S. Cavalry in Columbus’ southeast quadrant, the town would have little more significance than the desert that surrounded it.

Columbus, New Mexico's business district before March  9, 1916. 


The night was still on March 9, and the moon had nearly disappeared over the horizon when First Lieutenant John P. Lucas was awoken at 4:30AM by the sound of hoofbeats outside his adobe hut. Columbus’ streets were unlit, causing sentries to complain they could not see twenty feet in front of them. Yet through the darkness Lucas discerned the shadowy figures of several mounted men wearing sombreros, and instinctively knew Columbus was under attack. He retrieved his .45 pistol from its holster and, wearing only his underwear, quietly slipped into the center of the room facing the door, “determined to get a few of them before they got me” when they stormed the hut.

The eerie silence was broken by a shout. Private Fred Griffin, on guard duty outside the regiment’s headquarters a few hundred feet away, had spied the invaders outside Lucas’ hut. Griffin issued a challenge, but was answered by a rifle shot that hit him in the stomach. Griffin fired as he reeled backwards, killing his assailant and two other Mexicans before slumping to the ground and dying.

Lucas did not hesitate. Taking advantage of the sudden confusion, he put on his pants and raced barefoot out of his hut toward the barracks of the Machine Gun Troop he commanded. All hell was about to break loose in Columbus.

The legendary Mexican revolutionary and bandit Pancho Villa was leading 500 men in a cross-border raid on Columbus. Villa had divided his men into two columns: one column struck Camp Furlong simultaneously from the east and west, while the other moved to attack Columbus’ business district from the west. Panic erupted among the residents when the Villistas rode into Columbus shouting “Viva Villa! Viva Mexico!,” wildly shooting into houses and at any civilians in their path.



At Camp Furlong, Villa’s men mistook the stables for the sleeping quarters of the garrison, and directed most of their fire at horses rather than soldiers. Lieutenant Lucas was able to marshal his men and his machine guns. Deciding the first priority should be the defense of Camp Furlong, he set up the guns where they could cover the railroad crossing leading into camp. Yet because of the darkness, Lucas and his men could only aim bursts of fire in the direction of the Villistas’ muzzle flashes.

Meanwhile, Lieutenant James P. Castleman, serving on staff duty, heard the gunfire and ran out of his hut. As he turned the corner of the building he collided with a dismounted Mexican, whom he promptly shot and killed. By the time he reached his unit’s barracks, his sergeant had already rallied F Troop. Castleman led his men towards the regiment’s headquarters, advancing under heavy fire from nearby Villistas. As soon as the fire slackened, Castleman ordered the troop into Columbus, where the Mexicans had penetrated as far as the Commercial Hotel. There the raiders dragged civilian men into the street, robbing and murdering them. Others were killed on the stairs and in the lobby. The Mexicans made a serious tactical error, however, by setting fire to the hotel. Lucas and Castleman’s troops had linked up and took up firing positions on Main Street. The conflagration from the hotel illuminated the streets and allowed the cavalrymen to distinguish Americans from the Villistas. The U.S. forces trapped the enemy in a crossfire, and within 90 minutes Lucas’ four machine guns fired close to 20,000 rounds.

Finally, at 7:30AM a Villista bugler signaled retreat.

As soon as Columbus was clear of invaders, Major Frank Tompkins left his family’s house in town and ran to the only high ground, Cootes Hill. The 13th Cavalry’s commander, Colonel Frank Slocum, was directing the efforts of a group of riflemen firing at the retreating Mexicans, now clearly visible in the breaking dawn. “Realizing that the Mexicans were whipped,” Tompkins asked Slocum for permission to mount up a troop and pursue. Slocum assented, and Tompkins – who 16 years earlier had led then-Company H up the cliffs at Tirad Pass – organized H Troop for a counterattack. Within twenty minutes 32 men were riding after Villa’s force, soon to be joined by the 27 men of Castleman’s F Troop.

Tompkins’ detachment overtook the Mexicans 300 yards south of the border, where Villa’s rearguard waited, occupying the top of a ridge. Tompkins’ ordered a mounted pistol charge that drove the Villistas from the hill. Upon gaining the ridge’s crest, Tompkins’ men opened fire on the retreating Mexicans with their rifles, killing 32 men before Tompkins gave the order to cease fire. The Villistas galloped to a ridge a mile further south.

Tompkins continued the chase, and his detachment charged the Villistas three more times that morning, driving the bandits 15 miles into Mexico. Finally, the main body of 300 Villistas turned to attack the Americans. Heavily outnumbered, short on ammunition and water, and riding exhausted mounts, Tompkins withdrew. Although he had not lost a single man, on the way back to Columbus he counted nearly 100 dead Villistas.

Back in Columbus, the corpses of 67 raiders had been dragged to the outskirts of town, doused in kerosene, and set ablaze, “adding to the stench of smoldering wood from the gutted area along Main Street.” Seventeen Americans were killed during the fighting, including nine civilians. Four troopers, two officers, and one civilian were wounded as well. Captured Mexicans and copies of correspondence from Villa to other revolutionary commanders found on the body of a Villa aide confirmed that Pancho Villa had led the attack.

Mass burial of Villistas killed during the March 9, 1916 raid.

In three brief hours, Columbus was transformed from a poor, desolate desert town to the sight of the deadliest attack on U.S. soil by a foreign military force between the War of 1812 and Pearl Harbor.

The ruins of the Commerical Hotel and "downtown" Columbus after Villa's raid.

Thursday, March 8, 2012

Attention Tucson Readers

If anybody lives in the greater Tucson area, I will be appearing at the Tucson Festival of Books this weekend. 

I will be participating on two panels: 1) "Manhunts" at 1130 on Saturday, and 2) "Nasty Nazis and Other Vicious Villains" at 1000 on Sunday.  (The Saturday panel is self-explanatory, and on the Sunday panel I'll be discussing the hunt for Adolph Eichmann and the romanticization of manhunt targets such as Geronimo, Pancho Villa, Sandino, and Che Guevara).

I hope to see you there!

Ilyas Kashmiri: Not as Dead as Previously Thought?

The Long War Journal, citing reporting by the Daily Times of Pakistan, reports that senior al-Qa'ida leader Ilyas Kashmiri recently met with Hakeemullah Mehsud in North Waziristan.  This is significant because -- for those who don't remember -- U.S. intelligence officials claimed that Kashmiri was killed in a Predator strike in Pakistan on June 3, 2011. 

Well, damn!

As I noted at the time, Kashmiri's death was (or would have been) significant given his effectiveness as an operational commander and the importance of taking out al-Qa'ida's broader network in addition to killing bin Laden. 

Sadly, it turns out Ilyas Kashmiri was only mostly dead, and as Miracle Max can attest, "There's a big difference between mostly dead and all dead!"

Bin Laden's Wives Charged . . .

. . . with violating Pakistan's immigration laws.  No, really.

Speaking of Social Media . . .

I am not on Twitter in any way, shape, or form, but apparently while I was linking to the State Department's social media manhunt on March 31, two human rights groups were launching an online campaign against Lord's Resistance Army leader Joseph Kony that went viral, and the groups' video was viewed roughly 17 million times (8 million on Vimeo, 9 million on YouTube) as of yesterday afternoon.  Kony is the target of an ongoing manhunt in which 100 U.S. Special Forces troops are advising and assisting Ugandan and other local forces conducting operations against the LRA, a campaign I've blogged about before.

Despite the success of the Twitter campaign in raising awareness, there are some dissenting voices regarding the campaign.  In the AP story above, London School of Economics professor Tim Allen questions the long-term significance of capturing Kony:
Even if Kony is removed tomorrow the problems are not going to go away.  There is a chronic wide-spread failure of governance in parts of Central Africa.  This is a part of the world in which hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people have been killed since the late 1990s in ongoing wars, and the Lord's Resistance Army and Joseph Kony himself is responsible for very, very few of those deaths.
Similarly, on Foreign Policy.com, Michael Wilkerson notes the video's inaccuracies, and says "it is unclear how millions of well-meaning but misinformed people are going to help deal with the more complicated reality" of Uganda's problems.  Writing in the Toronto Globe and Mail, Salvator Cusimano and Sima Atri agree, arguing that "the Kony 2012 campaign's stated goals are simplistic at best and misleading at worst," and reaching a conclusion similar to my finding in Wanted Dead or Alive that "silencing one man doesn't silence the movement behind him."

Again, nobody is saying Kony isn't an evil man, and that he shouldn't face justice as soon as possible, whether before the International Criminal Court or at the business end of a rifle.  But is is far from clear that his apprehension will significantly affect the humanitarian nightmares springing from Central Africa's wars.

LRA Commander Joseph Kony: An evil man and quickly catching up to Ashton Kutcher on Twitter.

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Social Networking and Manhunting

I missed this last week, but the invaluable Noah Shachtman reported at Wired.com's Danger Room about a State Department-sponsored competition that basically consists of using social media to track down five "fugitives" in a worldwide manhunt.  The reward/prize is $5,000 for finding the fugitive within twelve hours of the release of his/her photo on March 31 in one of five international cities: New York, London, Washington, Stockholm, and Bratislava (wait . . . Bratislava?!?  Huh?). 

As regular readers of this blog well know, I'm nowhere near tech-savvy enough to be of much use in this competition.  But if anybody in the greater DC-area is going to form a team, I'd be very interested in hearing about how you plan on approaching the search.

Michael Yon, incidentally, wrote on geotags and social networking back in December 2010, a post which Glenn "Instapundit Reynolds linked to under the title "How to Get Tracked Down and Killed." 

Osama bin Laden is in Maryland?!?

Well, at least his body is, according to a theory expounded in internal Stratfor emails published by WikiLeaks.

According to the emails (obtained via hacker group Anonymous), Stratfor's vice president believed the Saudi's corpse was not buried at sea as reported, but rather transferred to the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology in Bethesda, Maryland. 

Why would the Obama administration do this, you ask?  Well, Stratfor executives offer no explanation, but say that "The US Govt needs to make body pics available like the MX's do, with OBL's pants pulled down, to shout down the lunatics like Alex Jones and Glenn Beck."

Yeah, because they're the conspiracy theorists here . . .

Note: I strongly condemn both 9/11 conspiracists such as Alex Jones and Wikileaks, but will never criticize Anonymous because I'm deathly afraid they'll screw with the iTunes playlists I've spent years meticulously constructing.